Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Active vs Passive Direct Boxes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Roberts" data-source="post: 24028" data-attributes="member: 126"><p>Re: Active vs Passive Direct Boxes</p><p></p><p>The pad in typical active DI (AFAIK) is generally in the output stage to drop the instrument level down to mic preamp level, or low enough to not overload a typical mic input. A pad on the input would conflict with the design goals of high input impedance and low noise. </p><p></p><p>Transformer DI have a turns ratio but this isn't literally a pad... no power is scrubbed off, but level and impedances are transformed based on the ratio. </p><p></p><p>I have seen specialty DI for speaker level signals but these were specialty items and not general purpose DI. The one I recall had unique frequency response shaping appropriate for mimicking instrument speaker's acoustic signature, not GP DI use. </p><p></p><p>So to answer the OP's question, an active DI could be overloaded by speaker level output, but for that matter a transformer DI designed to accept instrument level signals could also be saturated by speaker levels. </p><p></p><p>It is difficult for me to think of the entire DI category as something that could ever be covered by one design. Two, maybe even three sub categories. </p><p></p><p>JR</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Roberts, post: 24028, member: 126"] Re: Active vs Passive Direct Boxes The pad in typical active DI (AFAIK) is generally in the output stage to drop the instrument level down to mic preamp level, or low enough to not overload a typical mic input. A pad on the input would conflict with the design goals of high input impedance and low noise. Transformer DI have a turns ratio but this isn't literally a pad... no power is scrubbed off, but level and impedances are transformed based on the ratio. I have seen specialty DI for speaker level signals but these were specialty items and not general purpose DI. The one I recall had unique frequency response shaping appropriate for mimicking instrument speaker's acoustic signature, not GP DI use. So to answer the OP's question, an active DI could be overloaded by speaker level output, but for that matter a transformer DI designed to accept instrument level signals could also be saturated by speaker levels. It is difficult for me to think of the entire DI category as something that could ever be covered by one design. Two, maybe even three sub categories. JR [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Active vs Passive Direct Boxes
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!