Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Active vs Passive Direct Boxes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kip Conner" data-source="post: 24060" data-attributes="member: 445"><p>Re: Active vs Passive Direct Boxes</p><p></p><p>I'm no electrical engineer either an couldn't begin to speculate the order of components and their functions. I called Klark to find out why they put a -30dB pad swich on the box because I was having issue with the signal being too hot without the pad and way too low with the pad. I wished they had made it a -10 or -20dB pad because I felt -30dB was too drastic.</p><p></p><p>I was told by Klark that most DI boxes have at least attenuation pad. One built in to their circuitry to drop voltage for the pre-amp. Then if you chose you can buy a DI with an additional external pad to give you a little attenuation. The reason for the -30dB pad was that KT didn't put the internal pad in their circuitry (or if they did it's not as drastic as other direct boxes) to try to preserve the original source signal and to extend the dynamic range. That source signal could be an instrument or an xlr (if the mic or line needed a little transformer help)</p><p></p><p>I wish I knew more about the circuitry but the drawing of the Klark DN100 merely shows a transformer and a pad in front of the transformer triggered by an external bu[ATTACH]149571[/ATTACH]tton.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kip Conner, post: 24060, member: 445"] Re: Active vs Passive Direct Boxes I'm no electrical engineer either an couldn't begin to speculate the order of components and their functions. I called Klark to find out why they put a -30dB pad swich on the box because I was having issue with the signal being too hot without the pad and way too low with the pad. I wished they had made it a -10 or -20dB pad because I felt -30dB was too drastic. I was told by Klark that most DI boxes have at least attenuation pad. One built in to their circuitry to drop voltage for the pre-amp. Then if you chose you can buy a DI with an additional external pad to give you a little attenuation. The reason for the -30dB pad was that KT didn't put the internal pad in their circuitry (or if they did it's not as drastic as other direct boxes) to try to preserve the original source signal and to extend the dynamic range. That source signal could be an instrument or an xlr (if the mic or line needed a little transformer help) I wish I knew more about the circuitry but the drawing of the Klark DN100 merely shows a transformer and a pad in front of the transformer triggered by an external bu[ATTACH=CONFIG]149571.vB5-legacyid=868[/ATTACH]tton. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Active vs Passive Direct Boxes
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!