Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Chris Nixon" data-source="post: 131573" data-attributes="member: 1947">Re: Analog comeback?They&#039;d say it sounded great, as long as you didn&#039;t actually tell them it was digital.For certain tasks I find digital much faster actually, mixing monitors with sends on fader being the main one. It&#039;s also quicker to visually find what you want when you only have the stuff you want actually in front of you, rather than looking through a whole rack of flashing lights of dynamics to find the one that&#039;s inserted on the channel you&#039;re concerned with.&nbsp;I can see wanting to have certain stuff always available being attractive, an outboard lead vocal compressor maybe, so that&#039;s it&#039;s always right there no matter what page you&#039;re on. That could be done in digital too though, a separate small screen with knobs under it that doesn&#039;t change, or only ever has a couple of functions assigned to it. Like a UDK, but a whole interface. UDI?Chris</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Chris Nixon, post: 131573, member: 1947"] Re: Analog comeback? They'd say it sounded great, as long as you didn't actually tell them it was digital. For certain tasks I find digital much faster actually, mixing monitors with sends on fader being the main one. It's also quicker to visually find what you want when you only have the stuff you want actually in front of you, rather than looking through a whole rack of flashing lights of dynamics to find the one that's inserted on the channel you're concerned with. I can see wanting to have certain stuff always available being attractive, an outboard lead vocal compressor maybe, so that's it's always right there no matter what page you're on. That could be done in digital too though, a separate small screen with knobs under it that doesn't change, or only ever has a couple of functions assigned to it. Like a UDK, but a whole interface. UDI? Chris [/QUOTE]

Verification