Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="harrybrilljr" data-source="post: 89159" data-attributes="member: 103">Re: Anyone using the DPA D-Fine headworn mics?What type of source are you micing with these?&nbsp; Corporate is WAY WAY WAY different than broadway in regards to GBF.As for the mic, it sounds great, heard it for 2 days this week.&nbsp; GBF was OK.&nbsp; Omni or Cardioid I do not know.&nbsp; I assumed Omni.I have lots of experience with the older DPA and the Countryman.&nbsp; The Cardioids need to be right at the corner of the lips.&nbsp; If they are not aimed properly and not the proper distance, they suck.&nbsp; The omni&#039;s are forgiving.&nbsp; I do not use these in wedges or foldback so take that into consideration.&nbsp; I would use the cardioids where I had a group of loud singers standing close to each other, or a loud singer on one and a quiet singer on another.&nbsp; Use it more for rejection of surrounding audio.The person wearing the mic prefers the omni.&nbsp; It&#039;s smaller and less finicky to position.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="harrybrilljr, post: 89159, member: 103"] Re: Anyone using the DPA D-Fine headworn mics? What type of source are you micing with these? Corporate is WAY WAY WAY different than broadway in regards to GBF. As for the mic, it sounds great, heard it for 2 days this week. GBF was OK. Omni or Cardioid I do not know. I assumed Omni. I have lots of experience with the older DPA and the Countryman. The Cardioids need to be right at the corner of the lips. If they are not aimed properly and not the proper distance, they suck. The omni's are forgiving. I do not use these in wedges or foldback so take that into consideration. I would use the cardioids where I had a group of loud singers standing close to each other, or a loud singer on one and a quiet singer on another. Use it more for rejection of surrounding audio. The person wearing the mic prefers the omni. It's smaller and less finicky to position. [/QUOTE]

Verification