Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
DV array size proportional to LF response?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bennett Prescott" data-source="post: 132626" data-attributes="member: 4"><p>Re: DV array size proportional to LF response?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This would be my guess, but it also makes a huge difference how the "extra" four boxes in the array were turned off. Were they unplugged, was the processor muted, were the amps turned down? Are you sure they didn't just mute mids/highs and leave the lows running? When they re-hung the PA, did they use the same angles as before? It could be there was less HF aimed at FOH so the perception was more LF.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bennett Prescott, post: 132626, member: 4"] Re: DV array size proportional to LF response? This would be my guess, but it also makes a huge difference how the "extra" four boxes in the array were turned off. Were they unplugged, was the processor muted, were the amps turned down? Are you sure they didn't just mute mids/highs and leave the lows running? When they re-hung the PA, did they use the same angles as before? It could be there was less HF aimed at FOH so the perception was more LF. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
DV array size proportional to LF response?
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!
