Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
Educate me: AES cabling
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rob Timmerman" data-source="post: 138567" data-attributes="member: 172"><p>Re: Educate me: AES cabling</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As Frank has alluded to, the length of the cable and the wavelength of the signals matter in how you model the cable. For cables that are "short" relative to the wavelength of the signal, one typically models the cable as a lumped impedance (with R, L, and C values from the cable properties, typically length-dependant). This is the case for audio cables in almost all cases we run into in this industry.</p><p>For cables that are not electrically "short" relative to the wavelength of the signal, one typically models the cable as a transmission line with loss. In these cases, things like characteristic impedance and proper termination matter, and it is no longer valid to model the cable as a simple lumped impedance.</p><p></p><p>Cable capacitance can indeed alter the rise and fall times of digital data, but this is typically taken into account in the design of the digital system (and is one of the reasons for maximum cable length specifications).</p><p></p><p>The lengths at which a cable is no longer "electrically short" are given below for some frequencies of interest. All assume that the cable has a velocity factor of 0.6667, and that the maximum length for something to be electrically short is 1/10 the wavelength.</p><p></p><p>4khz (telephone-quality audio): 5km</p><p>20khz (high quality audio): 1km</p><p>250khz (DMX): 80m</p><p>6.144Mhz (AES audio): 3.25m</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rob Timmerman, post: 138567, member: 172"] Re: Educate me: AES cabling As Frank has alluded to, the length of the cable and the wavelength of the signals matter in how you model the cable. For cables that are "short" relative to the wavelength of the signal, one typically models the cable as a lumped impedance (with R, L, and C values from the cable properties, typically length-dependant). This is the case for audio cables in almost all cases we run into in this industry. For cables that are not electrically "short" relative to the wavelength of the signal, one typically models the cable as a transmission line with loss. In these cases, things like characteristic impedance and proper termination matter, and it is no longer valid to model the cable as a simple lumped impedance. Cable capacitance can indeed alter the rise and fall times of digital data, but this is typically taken into account in the design of the digital system (and is one of the reasons for maximum cable length specifications). The lengths at which a cable is no longer "electrically short" are given below for some frequencies of interest. All assume that the cable has a velocity factor of 0.6667, and that the maximum length for something to be electrically short is 1/10 the wavelength. 4khz (telephone-quality audio): 5km 20khz (high quality audio): 1km 250khz (DMX): 80m 6.144Mhz (AES audio): 3.25m [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
Educate me: AES cabling
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!