Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Don Krueger" data-source="post: 147767" data-attributes="member: 10523">Re: First Post.&nbsp; Need a little adviceHi, I&#039;m also a first time poster, but a long time reader.&nbsp;I&#039;m curious about the mono sound part. How does the OP get what I presume is a stereo output combined into mono without a little mixer or the knowledge to make a passive combiner? Maybe my presumption is wrong and the computer can be configured to provide a mono output?&nbsp;If it is a stereo output and a splitter cable, I think you would wind up with either one of these scenarios (depending on the splitter wiring).&nbsp;1. Two unbalanced signals (L and R) that would be going separately to different zones with each missing some information from the other stereo signal. 2. L and R connected to pins 2 and 3 of a balanced input, which would remove any components of the signal common to both sides.Don</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Don Krueger, post: 147767, member: 10523"] Re: First Post. Need a little advice Hi, I'm also a first time poster, but a long time reader. I'm curious about the mono sound part. How does the OP get what I presume is a stereo output combined into mono without a little mixer or the knowledge to make a passive combiner? Maybe my presumption is wrong and the computer can be configured to provide a mono output? If it is a stereo output and a splitter cable, I think you would wind up with either one of these scenarios (depending on the splitter wiring). 1. Two unbalanced signals (L and R) that would be going separately to different zones with each missing some information from the other stereo signal. 2. L and R connected to pins 2 and 3 of a balanced input, which would remove any components of the signal common to both sides. Don [/QUOTE]

Verification