Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="brian maddox" data-source="post: 91078" data-attributes="member: 158">Re: Transaction with Hal Harrisonthis is a bit pedantic i suppose, but i have to admit that when i saw the thread title i assumed this was going to be a &#039;problem&#039; transaction.&nbsp; i did take the time to read the OP and now know that Mr. Harrison is clearly a very stand up guy.&nbsp; That being said, if the OP could maybe put a qualifier like &#039;Great Transaction with Hal Harrison&#039; in the thread title, it might prevent anyone from assuming the worst without reading the best, particularly with Hal&#039;s name right in the title.or not.&nbsp; i admit i&#039;m being nitpicky.&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />And kudos both to Mr. Harrison for being a &#039;good guy&#039; and to Mr. Petrusky for taking the time to give credit where credit was due....</blockquote>

[QUOTE="brian maddox, post: 91078, member: 158"] Re: Transaction with Hal Harrison this is a bit pedantic i suppose, but i have to admit that when i saw the thread title i assumed this was going to be a 'problem' transaction. i did take the time to read the OP and now know that Mr. Harrison is clearly a very stand up guy. That being said, if the OP could maybe put a qualifier like 'Great Transaction with Hal Harrison' in the thread title, it might prevent anyone from assuming the worst without reading the best, particularly with Hal's name right in the title. or not. i admit i'm being nitpicky. :) And kudos both to Mr. Harrison for being a 'good guy' and to Mr. Petrusky for taking the time to give credit where credit was due.... [/QUOTE]

Verification