Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ivan Beaver" data-source="post: 140795" data-attributes="member: 30">Re: Infocomm???Maybe I am not seeing what you are seeing, but the -4dB point IS 35Hz. As referenced to the nonimal sensitivity.I have no idea where you are getting -10.&nbsp; &nbsp; The response is STATED as -4 and -10, NOT +/- anything.&nbsp; If you want to &quot;read something else into it&quot; then feel free to-that is why we provide measured freq responses and impedance curves-so the user can make up their own minds as to what the specs should be from from the data.&nbsp; MUCH better than a simple number that comes from &quot;who knows where&quot;That is the ONLY way to do it (in my-and other respected people who measure for a living).The -4dB point was chosen because it more realistically represents the actual freq response.Remember that the scale is LOG not linear-so 35Hz is not in the middle between 30 and 40, but rather a good bit closer to 40.The numbers ARE correct.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ivan Beaver, post: 140795, member: 30"] Re: Infocomm??? Maybe I am not seeing what you are seeing, but the -4dB point IS 35Hz. As referenced to the nonimal sensitivity. I have no idea where you are getting -10. The response is STATED as -4 and -10, NOT +/- anything. If you want to "read something else into it" then feel free to-that is why we provide measured freq responses and impedance curves-so the user can make up their own minds as to what the specs should be from from the data. MUCH better than a simple number that comes from "who knows where" That is the ONLY way to do it (in my-and other respected people who measure for a living). The -4dB point was chosen because it more realistically represents the actual freq response. Remember that the scale is LOG not linear-so 35Hz is not in the middle between 30 and 40, but rather a good bit closer to 40. The numbers ARE correct. [/QUOTE]

Verification