Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
International Frequency Coordination
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nitin Sidhu" data-source="post: 10533" data-attributes="member: 2521"><p>Hello!</p><p></p><p>I was wondering, there has been gig that I have had the opportunity to engineer a few times, elaborate, and we have used in excess of 50 channels of RF (iem + HH)</p><p></p><p>Im no wireless expert and dont take the responsibility. But it hasn't really been working.</p><p></p><p>Everyones been relying on WB6 or WSM to get the needful done. But the IEM's have a constant issue, so much so that the artists now consider it a given with iems. I know that we can face similar issues even if using 2 iem packs instead of 20. I also know that with proper coordination we can get many channels of iems to work.</p><p></p><p>Antenna placement and the drill aside, 3 questions.</p><p></p><p>1. Im not too sure if the likes of WB or WSM can actually do frequency 'coordination', when multiple units can come in proximity and cause inter modulation etc ?</p><p></p><p>2. And then, why is it always the IEM's that give issue ? A higher number of HH's all seem to work clean most of the time ?</p><p></p><p>3. Thirdly, there seems to be a solid foundation with FCC in the US where TV channel frequencies etc are easily available in the public domain.... but in India, and for example, Malaysia or Singapore, how would one work with something like the Professional Wireless software etc ?</p><p></p><p>Tx a ton!</p><p>Sidhu</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nitin Sidhu, post: 10533, member: 2521"] Hello! I was wondering, there has been gig that I have had the opportunity to engineer a few times, elaborate, and we have used in excess of 50 channels of RF (iem + HH) Im no wireless expert and dont take the responsibility. But it hasn't really been working. Everyones been relying on WB6 or WSM to get the needful done. But the IEM's have a constant issue, so much so that the artists now consider it a given with iems. I know that we can face similar issues even if using 2 iem packs instead of 20. I also know that with proper coordination we can get many channels of iems to work. Antenna placement and the drill aside, 3 questions. 1. Im not too sure if the likes of WB or WSM can actually do frequency 'coordination', when multiple units can come in proximity and cause inter modulation etc ? 2. And then, why is it always the IEM's that give issue ? A higher number of HH's all seem to work clean most of the time ? 3. Thirdly, there seems to be a solid foundation with FCC in the US where TV channel frequencies etc are easily available in the public domain.... but in India, and for example, Malaysia or Singapore, how would one work with something like the Professional Wireless software etc ? Tx a ton! Sidhu [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
International Frequency Coordination
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!