KSM9 vs. Beta 87A on UHF-R Wireless

D

Dave Gunnell

Freshman
Nov 28, 2012
2
0
0
Hi Everyone:

I currently own 8 channels of Shure UHF series wireless with Beta 87A capsules, and I’ve had great success with them on many different vocal sources, as well as occasional instrument solos at jazz festivals. While they have served me well for many years, I have decided to upgrade the system to UHF-R, and I’m considering ordering the KSM9 capsule this time around.

I do not own any wired KSM9s, but I’ve heard very good things about them. I like the fact that the coverage pattern can be switched from cardioid to super depending on the source and isolation needs.

While I’m tracking down a KSM9 to audition, I’m interested in opinions from those who have used this capsule. As mentioned earlier, main use will be vocal performance (at times high energy), with occasional use on instruments during jazz festivals. How do they compare to the Beta 87A? Do they sound good on both male and female voices? I’m not overly worried about the additional cost of this capsule, as long as it will be versatile, durable, of excellent sonic quality, and rider friendly.

Thoughts from those with experience would be appreciated. Thanks.

Dave
 
Re: KSM9 vs. Beta 87A on UHF-R Wireless

Dave Gunnell said:
Hi Everyone:

I currently own 8 channels of Shure UHF series wireless with Beta 87A capsules, and I’ve had great success with them on many different vocal sources, as well as occasional instrument solos at jazz festivals. While they have served me well for many years, I have decided to upgrade the system to UHF-R, and I’m considering ordering the KSM9 capsule this time around.

I do not own any wired KSM9s, but I’ve heard very good things about them. I like the fact that the coverage pattern can be switched from cardioid to super depending on the source and isolation needs.

While I’m tracking down a KSM9 to audition, I’m interested in opinions from those who have used this capsule. As mentioned earlier, main use will be vocal performance (at times high energy), with occasional use on instruments during jazz festivals. How do they compare to the Beta 87A? Do they sound good on both male and female voices? I’m not overly worried about the additional cost of this capsule, as long as it will be versatile, durable, of excellent sonic quality, and rider friendly.

Thoughts from those with experience would be appreciated. Thanks.

Dave
Click to expand...

It depends. If it sounds the best on a particular vocalist, and isn't unmanageable with the stage environment, then use a KSM9. When I rent a UHF-R rig, it happens to have the KSM9, Beta87a, SM58, and SM86 capsules in the kit. I actually find the SM86 is the one I use more often.

You should also look into the new Shure ULX-D system. Very cool design.

Best regards,

John
 
Re: KSM9 vs. Beta 87A on UHF-R Wireless

I work for a medium sized provider in the UK, we have 16 channels of UHF-R (a mix of UR4D and UR4D+). The capsules that see most demand are beta58s and KSM9s. We have both b87c and b87a capsules for our handhelds too, but these don't see anywhere near as much use. Personally, I think they sound better than the b87 and are more flexible on both vocals and instruments.
 
Top Bottom