Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
KSM9 vs. Beta 87A on UHF-R Wireless
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Halliburton" data-source="post: 76790" data-attributes="member: 8"><p>Re: KSM9 vs. Beta 87A on UHF-R Wireless</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It depends. If it sounds the best on a particular vocalist, and isn't unmanageable with the stage environment, then use a KSM9. When I rent a UHF-R rig, it happens to have the KSM9, Beta87a, SM58, and SM86 capsules in the kit. I actually find the SM86 is the one I use more often.</p><p></p><p>You should also look into the new Shure ULX-D system. Very cool design.</p><p></p><p>Best regards,</p><p></p><p>John</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Halliburton, post: 76790, member: 8"] Re: KSM9 vs. Beta 87A on UHF-R Wireless It depends. If it sounds the best on a particular vocalist, and isn't unmanageable with the stage environment, then use a KSM9. When I rent a UHF-R rig, it happens to have the KSM9, Beta87a, SM58, and SM86 capsules in the kit. I actually find the SM86 is the one I use more often. You should also look into the new Shure ULX-D system. Very cool design. Best regards, John [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
KSM9 vs. Beta 87A on UHF-R Wireless
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!
