Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
KSM9 vs. Beta 87A on UHF-R Wireless
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nick Boulton" data-source="post: 76905" data-attributes="member: 252"><p>Re: KSM9 vs. Beta 87A on UHF-R Wireless</p><p></p><p>I work for a medium sized provider in the UK, we have 16 channels of UHF-R (a mix of UR4D and UR4D+). The capsules that see most demand are beta58s and KSM9s. We have both b87c and b87a capsules for our handhelds too, but these don't see anywhere near as much use. Personally, I think they sound better than the b87 and are more flexible on both vocals and instruments.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nick Boulton, post: 76905, member: 252"] Re: KSM9 vs. Beta 87A on UHF-R Wireless I work for a medium sized provider in the UK, we have 16 channels of UHF-R (a mix of UR4D and UR4D+). The capsules that see most demand are beta58s and KSM9s. We have both b87c and b87a capsules for our handhelds too, but these don't see anywhere near as much use. Personally, I think they sound better than the b87 and are more flexible on both vocals and instruments. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
KSM9 vs. Beta 87A on UHF-R Wireless
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!
