Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="brian maddox" data-source="post: 68126" data-attributes="member: 158">Re: Mixing priorities.ah, Evan is young isn&#039;t he.&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />seriously, we used to have a stock &#039;curve&#039; on our graphs for our wedges.&nbsp; This was Pre DSP days.&nbsp; it wasn&#039;t a hack job, though.&nbsp; just a few 3 dB cuts at the wedge&#039;s hot spots.&nbsp; some BEs got what we were doing and used that as a starting point.&nbsp; others flattened and started over.&nbsp; the latter were usually at it a lot longer as a result.now, i do agree with mr. Kirkendall.&nbsp; in these days of cheap DSP, there is no reason for anyone to not have any &#039;necessary&#039; curve already preset and then just hand the BE a flat graph for tweaking.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="brian maddox, post: 68126, member: 158"] Re: Mixing priorities. ah, Evan is young isn't he. :) seriously, we used to have a stock 'curve' on our graphs for our wedges. This was Pre DSP days. it wasn't a hack job, though. just a few 3 dB cuts at the wedge's hot spots. some BEs got what we were doing and used that as a starting point. others flattened and started over. the latter were usually at it a lot longer as a result. now, i do agree with mr. Kirkendall. in these days of cheap DSP, there is no reason for anyone to not have any 'necessary' curve already preset and then just hand the BE a flat graph for tweaking. [/QUOTE]

Verification