Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Scott Bolt" data-source="post: 129833" data-attributes="member: 3950">Re: New Midas M32 ConsoleHi William (Bill?),I knew the X32 was sporting a pair of Sharc 3&#039;s... I have the specific version somewhere on my computer.&nbsp; I was hoping to get a look under the hood of the M32.&nbsp; Do you have a picture of the new console?I somehow doubt that the M32 is housing 4 Sharc 3&#039;s ..... although I do agree with your assertion that this would be the easiest way to get to 96K from 48K.&nbsp; The reason I doubt it is that the current revision of shipping firmware on the M32 is 2.07 vs 2.06 on the X32.&nbsp; As you point out, such a redistribution of workload would require quite a bit of work .... more than a minor rev of firmware I would think...... but I could be wrong <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />There is also the possibility that the M32 actually has 4 Sharc 3&#039;s but is currently only utilizing 2 in the interest of getting the product out.As for the sample rate, you are correct.&nbsp; I got carried away with my doubling of doubling with respect to the Nyquist frequency.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Scott Bolt, post: 129833, member: 3950"] Re: New Midas M32 Console Hi William (Bill?), I knew the X32 was sporting a pair of Sharc 3's... I have the specific version somewhere on my computer. I was hoping to get a look under the hood of the M32. Do you have a picture of the new console? I somehow doubt that the M32 is housing 4 Sharc 3's ..... although I do agree with your assertion that this would be the easiest way to get to 96K from 48K. The reason I doubt it is that the current revision of shipping firmware on the M32 is 2.07 vs 2.06 on the X32. As you point out, such a redistribution of workload would require quite a bit of work .... more than a minor rev of firmware I would think...... but I could be wrong ;) There is also the possibility that the M32 actually has 4 Sharc 3's but is currently only utilizing 2 in the interest of getting the product out. As for the sample rate, you are correct. I got carried away with my doubling of doubling with respect to the Nyquist frequency. [/QUOTE]

Verification