Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
New Midas M32 Console
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Scott Bolt" data-source="post: 129841" data-attributes="member: 3950"><p>Re: New Midas M32 Console</p><p></p><p>Considering the frequency range that 48K can cover (24K and below), I find it hard to believe that the added frequency response would have any audible effect on sound quality. I believe that the primary purpose of 96K processing is to cut the internal latencies in half so that a more pure mixing of different signal paths can be performed ...... which should give you a better sound.</p><p></p><p>It is of course useful to be able to integrate with 96K AES50 peripherals as well as Per points out.</p><p></p><p>It seems like a bad architectural move for Music Group to deviate the M32 in any meaningful way from the X32 from a hardware and firmware perspective (with the exception of graphics and physical controls which they have already done). The engineering effort required for such an endeavor would be costly and difficult to get a ROI from I expect.</p><p></p><p>I am guessing the only way for the M32 to be "96K ready" would be the expansion card interface mentioned.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Scott Bolt, post: 129841, member: 3950"] Re: New Midas M32 Console Considering the frequency range that 48K can cover (24K and below), I find it hard to believe that the added frequency response would have any audible effect on sound quality. I believe that the primary purpose of 96K processing is to cut the internal latencies in half so that a more pure mixing of different signal paths can be performed ...... which should give you a better sound. It is of course useful to be able to integrate with 96K AES50 peripherals as well as Per points out. It seems like a bad architectural move for Music Group to deviate the M32 in any meaningful way from the X32 from a hardware and firmware perspective (with the exception of graphics and physical controls which they have already done). The engineering effort required for such an endeavor would be costly and difficult to get a ROI from I expect. I am guessing the only way for the M32 to be "96K ready" would be the expansion card interface mentioned. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
New Midas M32 Console
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!