Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
New Midas M32 Console
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arik Semagin" data-source="post: 130574" data-attributes="member: 5072"><p>Re: Not A Pleasant First Outing with the M32</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That was the first thing I've noticed looking at the M32 pics from NAMM: its look has definite priority over functionality. I don't know if any real world sound engineer was involved at the design stage, but these barely visible red dots at the buttons is a serious flaw. The only other desk that's worse in this respect is AVID S3L, lights are also barely visible (on that one buttons are copied straight from studio S6 desk, obviously no one tested them under bright sun on a live gig). Being fan of Profile, I just can't stand S3L though.</p><p></p><p>Also, seems like that "96K-capable" thing we've been mumbling about since January boils down just to ability to use DL25 and DL15 series stageboxes clocked down to 48K. What's the point of introducing DL16 altogether, besides Ultranet/P16 monitoring? DL251 costs not whole lot more than two DL16 ($3.5K even on eBay), and preamps are supposedly the same in both.</p><p></p><p>Frankly my excitement about M32 went down. Would keep using X32 and probably get Yamaha QL5 instead of M32. Price is double, but looks like it's worth it. Not whole lot bigger, but has everything I wish M32 had.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arik Semagin, post: 130574, member: 5072"] Re: Not A Pleasant First Outing with the M32 That was the first thing I've noticed looking at the M32 pics from NAMM: its look has definite priority over functionality. I don't know if any real world sound engineer was involved at the design stage, but these barely visible red dots at the buttons is a serious flaw. The only other desk that's worse in this respect is AVID S3L, lights are also barely visible (on that one buttons are copied straight from studio S6 desk, obviously no one tested them under bright sun on a live gig). Being fan of Profile, I just can't stand S3L though. Also, seems like that "96K-capable" thing we've been mumbling about since January boils down just to ability to use DL25 and DL15 series stageboxes clocked down to 48K. What's the point of introducing DL16 altogether, besides Ultranet/P16 monitoring? DL251 costs not whole lot more than two DL16 ($3.5K even on eBay), and preamps are supposedly the same in both. Frankly my excitement about M32 went down. Would keep using X32 and probably get Yamaha QL5 instead of M32. Price is double, but looks like it's worth it. Not whole lot bigger, but has everything I wish M32 had. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
New Midas M32 Console
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!