Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
Sim VS Smaart
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Merlijn van Veen" data-source="post: 96386" data-attributes="member: 4708"><p>AFAICT based on the numbers, this is where SIM and SMAART differ from each other, the OP's question. Ergo, their respective manufacturers have different takes on said hearing mechanism, echo perception and such. This also affects the extent of "dips" and "humps". With no or equal smoothing, a kind post processing IMO if you will, SIM shows similar tonal envelopes as SMAART with overall less comb-filtering , due to late arrivals. This is why I feel SIM is more accurate.</p><p></p><p>+1 on everything else you wrote</p><p></p><p>SMAART has some evident advantages over SIM, as has been mentioned numerous times before, with concern to multi mics and weighted averaging. </p><p></p><p>Delay tracking is also very handy.</p><p></p><p>I'd very much like to own both solutions and use them next to each other, in their respective area of expertise.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Merlijn van Veen, post: 96386, member: 4708"] AFAICT based on the numbers, this is where SIM and SMAART differ from each other, the OP's question. Ergo, their respective manufacturers have different takes on said hearing mechanism, echo perception and such. This also affects the extent of "dips" and "humps". With no or equal smoothing, a kind post processing IMO if you will, SIM shows similar tonal envelopes as SMAART with overall less comb-filtering , due to late arrivals. This is why I feel SIM is more accurate. +1 on everything else you wrote SMAART has some evident advantages over SIM, as has been mentioned numerous times before, with concern to multi mics and weighted averaging. Delay tracking is also very handy. I'd very much like to own both solutions and use them next to each other, in their respective area of expertise. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
Sim VS Smaart
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!