Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jack Arnott" data-source="post: 108025" data-attributes="member: 304">Re: Speaker on Stick build with large budgetAnother advantage is stability. When the load is hanging, if the unit is bumped, the load will stay in the same place, then swing back and forth, and somewhat self correct. With a rigid pole, the load immediately goes to the extreme of the bump. Jeff is one of my favorite customers. I really like the sound of the mid-range diaphragm. And having point source from 3 or 400hz up is great. Of course there is a disconnect at the crossover point, from lows on the ground to mids in the air, but to me the advantages far outweigh that. I would quibble with you on this Riley. I think the definition of &quot;speaker on a stick&quot; is solo. So scalability is not needed. Larger work would be a scaleable system.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jack Arnott, post: 108025, member: 304"] Re: Speaker on Stick build with large budget Another advantage is stability. When the load is hanging, if the unit is bumped, the load will stay in the same place, then swing back and forth, and somewhat self correct. With a rigid pole, the load immediately goes to the extreme of the bump. Jeff is one of my favorite customers. I really like the sound of the mid-range diaphragm. And having point source from 3 or 400hz up is great. Of course there is a disconnect at the crossover point, from lows on the ground to mids in the air, but to me the advantages far outweigh that. I would quibble with you on this Riley. I think the definition of "speaker on a stick" is solo. So scalability is not needed. Larger work would be a scaleable system. [/QUOTE]

Verification