Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Robert Piascik" data-source="post: 121969" data-attributes="member: 1385">Re: Speaker on Stick build with large budgetBut when you say the &quot;loudest&quot; cabinet....At a high end wedding or corp event, the volume of the band can only be what is acceptable for the client. So if you say one box is &quot;louder&quot; than the other, isn&#039;t what you&#039;re saying is that it&#039;s more &#039;efficient&#039; or more &#039;sensitive&#039;? that you can get to the desired volume with less gain applied or less power draw? And therefore the advantage is exactly what? That you don&#039;t have to push the slider as high or that you draw fewer amps out of the wall? All the systems listed here I assume are good enough to achieve volume more than loud enough for the band to be heard in a hotel or country club ballroom with one speaker (or speaker and sub stack) per side.Help me understand why it&#039;s such a desirable advantage for someone to go with a &quot;louder&quot; box.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Robert Piascik, post: 121969, member: 1385"] Re: Speaker on Stick build with large budget But when you say the "loudest" cabinet.... At a high end wedding or corp event, the volume of the band can only be what is acceptable for the client. So if you say one box is "louder" than the other, isn't what you're saying is that it's more 'efficient' or more 'sensitive'? that you can get to the desired volume with less gain applied or less power draw? And therefore the advantage is exactly what? That you don't have to push the slider as high or that you draw fewer amps out of the wall? All the systems listed here I assume are good enough to achieve volume more than loud enough for the band to be heard in a hotel or country club ballroom with one speaker (or speaker and sub stack) per side. Help me understand why it's such a desirable advantage for someone to go with a "louder" box. [/QUOTE]

Verification