Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Chris Cotton" data-source="post: 80112" data-attributes="member: 3677">Re: Uli Behringer of The Music Group Q&amp;AMr Spence, I have already invested a considerable amount in money and time and have already made my choice in format. I will *never* be implementing Dante into any of my existing systems. I chose the rock-solid RME clock as the heart of my systems. I&#039;ve been using and developing SAC for many years and already have infrastructure in place that matches Uli&#039;s ada8200&#039;s existing features and I will continue to. Features that he&#039;s decided will be utilized far into the future. I agree with his decision. I&#039;m no fan of A-net, but would be more available to migrating towards his ultranet system, since I will have it on the box. All I&#039;m missing is the final translation of my 50 &amp; 100&#039; sub snakes from copper to ethernet. A remote ADA8200, one or two at center stage an one or two to each sided would be ideal for festival setup and damn near every other situ I would come across. So if Uli can have some protocols crammed into a small mu-metal box with an ADAT jack (or two) at one side and an ether pair on the opposite, He would be supplying the only missing device. If the ADA&#039;s can retain (or be close to) the price point and market placement of the older brother, I&#039;ll buy them. A lot of them. If he can give me the box that let&#039;s me run ether to them, while still tying into my ADAT RME cards, then happy day. And good luck speaking for the world, a couple of other guys tried that, and they didn&#039;t turnout well, at all.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Chris Cotton, post: 80112, member: 3677"] Re: Uli Behringer of The Music Group Q&A Mr Spence, I have already invested a considerable amount in money and time and have already made my choice in format. I will *never* be implementing Dante into any of my existing systems. I chose the rock-solid RME clock as the heart of my systems. I've been using and developing SAC for many years and already have infrastructure in place that matches Uli's ada8200's existing features and I will continue to. Features that he's decided will be utilized far into the future. I agree with his decision. I'm no fan of A-net, but would be more available to migrating towards his ultranet system, since I will have it on the box. All I'm missing is the final translation of my 50 & 100' sub snakes from copper to ethernet. A remote ADA8200, one or two at center stage an one or two to each sided would be ideal for festival setup and damn near every other situ I would come across. So if Uli can have some protocols crammed into a small mu-metal box with an ADAT jack (or two) at one side and an ether pair on the opposite, He would be supplying the only missing device. If the ADA's can retain (or be close to) the price point and market placement of the older brother, I'll buy them. A lot of them. If he can give me the box that let's me run ether to them, while still tying into my ADAT RME cards, then happy day. And good luck speaking for [I]the world[/I], a couple of other guys tried that, [I]and they didn't turnout well[/I], at all. [/QUOTE]

Verification