Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Art Welter" data-source="post: 88534" data-attributes="member: 52">Re: Would you buy this product?Phil,Funny, in the years that I regularly used SM58, I never found the mic to have an issue at 500 Hz, though&nbsp; there are particular voices or speakers with a problem there.Been a long time since I used an SM58, perhaps the frequency response has been changed from the &quot;good old days&quot;. Nearly all dynamic cardioid mics have a low frequency proximity effect when used close, a large increase of frequencies in the 125-200 Hz range, getting rid of that could almost be a &quot;one size fit all&quot; de-mudder.However, if a PA had no EQ, and the proximity effect was an issue, I&#039;d just use an EV RE series &quot;variable D&quot; (no proximic effect) or SM 54 mic.If a barrel connector was passive (can&#039;t rely on a no EQ pa to have phantom) and had a 6 or 8 position dip switch that could notch out various frequencies for cheap, I&#039;d consider it.If I were in need of such a product, I&#039;d be more inclined to use a much more flexible $25 EQ and a couple of XLR-1/4&quot; adapters already in my kit:</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Art Welter, post: 88534, member: 52"] Re: Would you buy this product? Phil, Funny, in the years that I regularly used SM58, I never found the mic to have an issue at 500 Hz, though there are particular voices or speakers with a problem there. Been a long time since I used an SM58, perhaps the frequency response has been changed from the "good old days". Nearly all dynamic cardioid mics have a low frequency proximity effect when used close, a large increase of frequencies in the 125-200 Hz range, getting rid of that could almost be a "one size fit all" de-mudder. However, if a PA had no EQ, and the proximity effect was an issue, I'd just use an EV RE series "variable D" (no proximic effect) or SM 54 mic. If a barrel connector was passive (can't rely on a no EQ pa to have phantom) and had a 6 or 8 position dip switch that could notch out various frequencies for cheap, I'd consider it. If I were in need of such a product, I'd be more inclined to use a much more flexible $25 EQ and a couple of XLR-1/4" adapters already in my kit: [/QUOTE]

Verification