Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Peter van Gils" data-source="post: 148683" data-attributes="member: 3943">Re: X32 and outboard rack....anyone use oneYes, you can plug the output of the x-over in the XLR or jack inputs of the X32 and route them directly over AES50 to a remote S16/X32rack/... (without eating up input channels or busses). I grabbed a picture from the internet: in the right columns you can see that the local inputs can be sent directly over AES50.<a href="https://musicgroup-prod.mindtouch.us/@api/deki/files/334/routing_2.jpg?size=bestfit&amp;width=450&amp;height=278&amp;revision=1" target="_blank">https://musicgroup-prod.mindtouch.us/@api/deki/files/334/routing_2.jpg?size=bestfit&amp;width=450&amp;height=278&amp;revision=1</a>Though, I would use the internal matrix x-overs... The probability that you make a wiring error is even bigger this way than when using the internal x-overs. If you want to make things fool proof, the x-overs should be in the amp racks with wiring inaccessible and UI password locked ;-)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Peter van Gils, post: 148683, member: 3943"] Re: X32 and outboard rack....anyone use one Yes, you can plug the output of the x-over in the XLR or jack inputs of the X32 and route them directly over AES50 to a remote S16/X32rack/... (without eating up input channels or busses). I grabbed a picture from the internet: in the right columns you can see that the local inputs can be sent directly over AES50. [URL]https://musicgroup-prod.mindtouch.us/@api/deki/files/334/routing_2.jpg?size=bestfit&width=450&height=278&revision=1[/URL] Though, I would use the internal matrix x-overs... The probability that you make a wiring error is even bigger this way than when using the internal x-overs. If you want to make things fool proof, the x-overs should be in the amp racks with wiring inaccessible and UI password locked ;-) [/QUOTE]

Verification