Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Per SÃ¸vik" data-source="post: 100480" data-attributes="member: 1285">Re: Master/Slave X32 with X32 Compact1. Edit, John is of course right(next post), I seem to remember there was a problem in the early days, but that might have been related to a different setting or routing to a monitor desk. The only real way around all issues related to different requirements for main mix and monitors is to split the signal into two channels, and have a monitor layer and a mix layer if you are not using the channels. Then you can have eq that is suited to the monitors and you are free to do whatever you want for the main mix, including inserts that might add too much latency for monitor use (particularly iem)2. Mirror, you have the same output on the desk and on the S16.3. -18 dBFS is a good nominal level to use throughout, that will give you +4dBu or thereabouts on the outputs if your output meters also are around -18dBFS&nbsp; (where they turn yellow)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Per SÃ¸vik, post: 100480, member: 1285"] Re: Master/Slave X32 with X32 Compact 1. Edit, John is of course right(next post), I seem to remember there was a problem in the early days, but that might have been related to a different setting or routing to a monitor desk. The only real way around all issues related to different requirements for main mix and monitors is to split the signal into two channels, and have a monitor layer and a mix layer if you are not using the channels. Then you can have eq that is suited to the monitors and you are free to do whatever you want for the main mix, including inserts that might add too much latency for monitor use (particularly iem) 2. Mirror, you have the same output on the desk and on the S16. 3. -18 dBFS is a good nominal level to use throughout, that will give you +4dBu or thereabouts on the outputs if your output meters also are around -18dBFS (where they turn yellow) [/QUOTE]

Verification