Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Howard Tomlinson" data-source="post: 113525" data-attributes="member: 6460"><p>Re: NAMM</p><p></p><p>sales ranking:</p><p><a href="http://www.thomann.de/gb/prod_vrank~ncx.html?ar=308703" target="_blank">Product Sales Rank: Digital Mixing Desks - Thomann UK</a></p><p>although they don't publish actual quantity of sales and having had a play around with the interface, you get different results depending on how you find your way to their ranking system.</p><p>the scribble strip missing is only an issue for those of us who have been spoiled with it. it isn't present on the qu16 - and there is your comparison - put the qu16 and the x32 producer next to each other - that's it's marketing point. i was with a professional musician on tuesday and reviewing the qu16 i advised him to go for that, as it was simpler to follow for him, less features but all the essentials, all 16 faders available to grab. versus the x32 producer, which only had 8 faders to grab (mixing as a musician) but much more feature rich set. if i had the money for a 2nd desk i would most definitely have the producer myself as a desk on the go for recording and working with small shows. the qu16 just happened to work for him coming from that 16 channel rack mount world. the producer and qu16 are both mixwiz replacements for the 21st century - when you view them that way, it becomes obvious where it's market is.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Howard Tomlinson, post: 113525, member: 6460"] Re: NAMM sales ranking: [url=http://www.thomann.de/gb/prod_vrank~ncx.html?ar=308703]Product Sales Rank: Digital Mixing Desks - Thomann UK[/url] although they don't publish actual quantity of sales and having had a play around with the interface, you get different results depending on how you find your way to their ranking system. the scribble strip missing is only an issue for those of us who have been spoiled with it. it isn't present on the qu16 - and there is your comparison - put the qu16 and the x32 producer next to each other - that's it's marketing point. i was with a professional musician on tuesday and reviewing the qu16 i advised him to go for that, as it was simpler to follow for him, less features but all the essentials, all 16 faders available to grab. versus the x32 producer, which only had 8 faders to grab (mixing as a musician) but much more feature rich set. if i had the money for a 2nd desk i would most definitely have the producer myself as a desk on the go for recording and working with small shows. the qu16 just happened to work for him coming from that 16 channel rack mount world. the producer and qu16 are both mixwiz replacements for the 21st century - when you view them that way, it becomes obvious where it's market is. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!