Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Robert Lofgren" data-source="post: 124771" data-attributes="member: 2447"><p>Re: X32 Discussion</p><p></p><p>Just for fun and to update my earlier post regarding PoE on the p16m I have tested to connect two p16m's in parallell using some old isdn passive terminal splitter.</p><p></p><p>This worked out great and with the PoE I got a nice solution for my two p16m's without using the p16d.</p><p></p><p>I am assuming due to the slight impedance mismatch that the effective maximum length of the cable is reduced. However for shorter lengths there seems to be no issues.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Robert Lofgren, post: 124771, member: 2447"] Re: X32 Discussion Just for fun and to update my earlier post regarding PoE on the p16m I have tested to connect two p16m's in parallell using some old isdn passive terminal splitter. This worked out great and with the PoE I got a nice solution for my two p16m's without using the p16d. I am assuming due to the slight impedance mismatch that the effective maximum length of the cable is reduced. However for shorter lengths there seems to be no issues. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
X32 Discussion
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!
