Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Off Topic
The Basement
4 July Hi-Fi
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Art Welter" data-source="post: 97452" data-attributes="member: 52"><p>Re: 4 July Hi-Fi</p><p></p><p></p><p>Ivan,</p><p></p><p>In light of the fact that you don't recall when the original measurements/spec sheet were made, and given the fact that the original DSL test date predates Langston's test date by some time, and Langston's tests (that I posted) were done using the 18Sound drivers, it seems more likely to me that the spec sheets reflect the 18sound driver, not the B&C.</p><p></p><p>The time line and the obvious rated power discrepancy (the spec is for the 18sound, not the B&C) simply does not support the original test being done with the current B&C drivers, and since no re-test has happened, it only seems logical that the spec sheet does not reflect the sensitivity and impedance curve of the current driver, even if the frequency response somehow remained identical, unlikely considering the TS parameter differences between the drivers.</p><p></p><p>Art</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Art Welter, post: 97452, member: 52"] Re: 4 July Hi-Fi Ivan, In light of the fact that you don't recall when the original measurements/spec sheet were made, and given the fact that the original DSL test date predates Langston's test date by some time, and Langston's tests (that I posted) were done using the 18Sound drivers, it seems more likely to me that the spec sheets reflect the 18sound driver, not the B&C. The time line and the obvious rated power discrepancy (the spec is for the 18sound, not the B&C) simply does not support the original test being done with the current B&C drivers, and since no re-test has happened, it only seems logical that the spec sheet does not reflect the sensitivity and impedance curve of the current driver, even if the frequency response somehow remained identical, unlikely considering the TS parameter differences between the drivers. Art [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Off Topic
The Basement
4 July Hi-Fi
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!