Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mark Wilkinson" data-source="post: 203270" data-attributes="member: 8989">Hi Andy, I&#039;ve been hesitant to chime in with measurements because I kinda went off on my own to stay as small/light&nbsp; as possible and do interchangeable baffles.........but, with only minor differences, I followed Don&#039;s earlier 90 degree plan, and the 60 degree fits too.&nbsp; Tight, but it fits !I just measured and have 342mm internal depth, from the horn baffle to the point where the 12&quot; rests on its baffle board.&nbsp; (This is assuming you are routing out the baffle board for clearance.&nbsp; I used a spacer, so I should really say I have 342mm internal to the spacer.)Real bottom line IMO is, you have boat loads of front-to-back clearance for the 90 degree at 342mm...FWIW, I bought a big sketch pad and laid out the design full size, old school trig style, and was sure enough of dimensions I just pre-cut everything, and all worked well.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mark Wilkinson, post: 203270, member: 8989"] Hi Andy, I've been hesitant to chime in with measurements because I kinda went off on my own to stay as small/light as possible and do interchangeable baffles..... ....but, with only minor differences, I followed Don's earlier 90 degree plan, and the 60 degree fits too. Tight, but it fits ! I just measured and have 342mm internal depth, from the horn baffle to the point where the 12" rests on its baffle board. (This is assuming you are routing out the baffle board for clearance. I used a spacer, so I should really say I have 342mm internal to the spacer.) Real bottom line IMO is, you have boat loads of front-to-back clearance for the 90 degree at 342mm... FWIW, I bought a big sketch pad and laid out the design full size, old school trig style, and was sure enough of dimensions I just pre-cut everything, and all worked well. [/QUOTE]

Verification