Normal
The official wording from B&C themselves on the news release say:And in this other thread NEW B&C coaxial MF/HF Bennett also says:I'm pretty tempted to believe it really does perform the same at 650hz; just because it hasn't been possible in the past on a smaller diaphragm doesn't mean it will always be that way. I'd like to believe as the technology matures it's possible to squeeze out more performance over time. It seems reasonable to believe that the 464 was intentionally designed as a direct competitor and drop in replacement for the BMS 4594ND (now 11 year old design) and that with careful assessment and overhaul the optimised 354 can now do the same with close to no compromises.
The official wording from B&C themselves on the news release say:
And in this other thread NEW B&C coaxial MF/HF Bennett also says:
I'm pretty tempted to believe it really does perform the same at 650hz; just because it hasn't been possible in the past on a smaller diaphragm doesn't mean it will always be that way. I'd like to believe as the technology matures it's possible to squeeze out more performance over time. It seems reasonable to believe that the 464 was intentionally designed as a direct competitor and drop in replacement for the BMS 4594ND (now 11 year old design) and that with careful assessment and overhaul the optimised 354 can now do the same with close to no compromises.
