Normal
Re: A cautionary tale against buying the line6 digital wirelessGood to know.Just checking since this is quite a common mistake to do...Another common mistake is having the antennas not be more or less fully above the rack into free air and/or too close to the metal parts of the rack and its gear so that the signal becomes degraded/multiplexed due to reflections/standing waves bouncing of the metal causing the agc to operate or create digital errors due to multiple delayed signal paths entering into the antenna.It could also be that some of the rack gear being too close to the reciever introduces interference due to rfiIf possible try to relocate the antennas/reciever into free air not too close to metal parts in the rack. I'm talkning very short distance, like 10-30cm, so an ordinary rg-58 should be quite enough and I think the reciever came with short cables and some half-rack antenna plate with bnc adaptors you can use for your test.
Re: A cautionary tale against buying the line6 digital wireless
Good to know.
Just checking since this is quite a common mistake to do...
Another common mistake is having the antennas not be more or less fully above the rack into free air and/or too close to the metal parts of the rack and its gear so that the signal becomes degraded/multiplexed due to reflections/standing waves bouncing of the metal causing the agc to operate or create digital errors due to multiple delayed signal paths entering into the antenna.
It could also be that some of the rack gear being too close to the reciever introduces interference due to rfi
If possible try to relocate the antennas/reciever into free air not too close to metal parts in the rack. I'm talkning very short distance, like 10-30cm, so an ordinary rg-58 should be quite enough and I think the reciever came with short cables and some half-rack antenna plate with bnc adaptors you can use for your test.
