Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Acoustic guitar pickups
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="frank kayser" data-source="post: 14768" data-attributes="member: 28"><p>Re: Acoustic guitar pickups</p><p></p><p>Dick,</p><p></p><p>What a crapshoot. I've heard cheap guitars with the Fishman clamp-on humbucker sound great, at the same time, a Martin or a Taylor sound like a wet shoebox. I have a friend with a high-end Taylor in maple that sounds terrible in the winter, and merely miserable in the summer. I attribute some of that to the ''goofy on-board EQ''...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Mostly, I too try to have an eq available as an insert on the channel. For the most part (and there are as many exceptions as there are guitars) I find most of the fundamental string frequencies way overpowering the harmonics - and I find myself cutting a-220 for an octave or octave and a half to let some of the higher harmonics through - maybe a presence boost too - One Martin OM I work with sounds great unplugged but gave me fits to get it sounding anything close to right - no bottom end at all - just a hollow, muddy mid mix. Added a bunch of a-220 down, sharply cut some mids above that and added some highs >1K to let some harmonics through.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I can get them somewhat acceptable, let's say, not objectionable, but never great. The body ring and resonance is lost too many times even with good factory pickup systems. Add an internal condenser mic, and you end up with a howling good time on a loud band. The pickups are popular because they are convenient, not because they sound great.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The best I've heard were a Taylor w/bridge pickup and internal condenser, and a Martin D28 w/ K&K Trinity.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>frank</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="frank kayser, post: 14768, member: 28"] Re: Acoustic guitar pickups Dick, What a crapshoot. I've heard cheap guitars with the Fishman clamp-on humbucker sound great, at the same time, a Martin or a Taylor sound like a wet shoebox. I have a friend with a high-end Taylor in maple that sounds terrible in the winter, and merely miserable in the summer. I attribute some of that to the ''goofy on-board EQ''... Mostly, I too try to have an eq available as an insert on the channel. For the most part (and there are as many exceptions as there are guitars) I find most of the fundamental string frequencies way overpowering the harmonics - and I find myself cutting a-220 for an octave or octave and a half to let some of the higher harmonics through - maybe a presence boost too - One Martin OM I work with sounds great unplugged but gave me fits to get it sounding anything close to right - no bottom end at all - just a hollow, muddy mid mix. Added a bunch of a-220 down, sharply cut some mids above that and added some highs >1K to let some harmonics through. I can get them somewhat acceptable, let's say, not objectionable, but never great. The body ring and resonance is lost too many times even with good factory pickup systems. Add an internal condenser mic, and you end up with a howling good time on a loud band. The pickups are popular because they are convenient, not because they sound great. The best I've heard were a Taylor w/bridge pickup and internal condenser, and a Martin D28 w/ K&K Trinity. frank [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Acoustic guitar pickups
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!