Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Greg Cameron" data-source="post: 40394" data-attributes="member: 42">Re: Acoustic treatment alternativesYes, that&#039;s the stuff. Sorry for lack of specificity. So far it seems like the best deal going and the absorption coefficients looks pretty good:<a href="http://www.acousticalsurfaces.com/wall_insulation/ultratouch.htm" target="_blank">http://www.acousticalsurfaces.com/wall_insulation/ultratouch.htm</a>The concept was to build wood framing for the walls to so the Guiliford FR cloth would have nice lines after covering the insulation. The ceiling doesn&#039;t need to look as pretty but, it needs to be safely suspended &amp; covered with black cloth. A potential cost savings might be to use Guiliford only for the walls and something less costly &amp; black for the ceiling that still has an adequate fire rating. Any thoughts on that? And would tacking the stuff directly to the ceiling have a substantial effect on the absorption coefficients? I would thing that compressing it that would would reduce effectiveness.Greg</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Greg Cameron, post: 40394, member: 42"] Re: Acoustic treatment alternatives Yes, that's the stuff. Sorry for lack of specificity. So far it seems like the best deal going and the absorption coefficients looks pretty good: [url]http://www.acousticalsurfaces.com/wall_insulation/ultratouch.htm[/url] The concept was to build wood framing for the walls to so the Guiliford FR cloth would have nice lines after covering the insulation. The ceiling doesn't need to look as pretty but, it needs to be safely suspended & covered with black cloth. A potential cost savings might be to use Guiliford only for the walls and something less costly & black for the ceiling that still has an adequate fire rating. Any thoughts on that? And would tacking the stuff directly to the ceiling have a substantial effect on the absorption coefficients? I would thing that compressing it that would would reduce effectiveness. Greg [/QUOTE]

Verification