Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Greg Cameron" data-source="post: 40396" data-attributes="member: 42">Re: Acoustic treatment alternativesWe&#039;d be going for the thick UltraTouch stuff which appear to work down pretty low. I hear where you&#039;re coming from with potential &#039;boomyness,&#039; but that&#039;s one area where the room doesn&#039;t appear to have issue. The neighbors might feel otherwise <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> We figured with the thick stuff and going for a shotgun approach to the majority of surfaces that we could mitigate the issues once and for all without having to revisit and redo as you indicated. Of course, we may wind up having to take a piecemeal approach if we can&#039;t get the money together to do it all at once. And then it becomes a guessing game as to which surfaces to treat first to get the most benefit- something we wanted to avoid.Thanks for the info Brad, much appreciated.&nbsp;Greg</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Greg Cameron, post: 40396, member: 42"] Re: Acoustic treatment alternatives We'd be going for the thick UltraTouch stuff which appear to work down pretty low. I hear where you're coming from with potential 'boomyness,' but that's one area where the room doesn't appear to have issue. The neighbors might feel otherwise ;) We figured with the thick stuff and going for a shotgun approach to the majority of surfaces that we could mitigate the issues once and for all without having to revisit and redo as you indicated. Of course, we may wind up having to take a piecemeal approach if we can't get the money together to do it all at once. And then it becomes a guessing game as to which surfaces to treat first to get the most benefit- something we wanted to avoid. Thanks for the info Brad, much appreciated. Greg [/QUOTE]

Verification