Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ivan Beaver" data-source="post: 107489" data-attributes="member: 30">Re: Array ConfigurationOf course it depends on the particular loudspeaker.And you HAVE to look at other freq.&nbsp; What looks great at 1K may completely fall apart at other freq.With any model YOU HAVE to look at the entire freq range-not just getting hung up on a single freq.The splay angle will depend on what the ACTUAL pattern of the loudspeaker is-NOT just the stated angle.&nbsp; Of course if the angle changes with freq-then there is no way you can properly array them&nbsp; POLARS ARE important.&nbsp; NOT just a single published coverage numberIn my opinion the cut angles on the cabinets have to cut at 1/2 the rated coverage angle-if there is any chance of it actually being &quot;arrayable&quot;.You must be able to get the HF and mid drivers very close to each other if it is going to be arrayable.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ivan Beaver, post: 107489, member: 30"] Re: Array Configuration Of course it depends on the particular loudspeaker. And you HAVE to look at other freq. What looks great at 1K may completely fall apart at other freq. With any model YOU HAVE to look at the entire freq range-not just getting hung up on a single freq. The splay angle will depend on what the ACTUAL pattern of the loudspeaker is-NOT just the stated angle. Of course if the angle changes with freq-then there is no way you can properly array them POLARS ARE important. NOT just a single published coverage number In my opinion the cut angles on the cabinets have to cut at 1/2 the rated coverage angle-if there is any chance of it actually being "arrayable". You must be able to get the HF and mid drivers very close to each other if it is going to be arrayable. [/QUOTE]

Verification