Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Daniel Levi" data-source="post: 91630" data-attributes="member: 2411">Re: Australia Wireless Mic &amp; IEM Frequency ChangesSame thing happed in Britain, used to be that wireless mic users had a small portion of channel 69 (usually around 4 mics) and you could get a shared use licence for channel 70. OFCOM (Our communications regulator) then realised that with digital switchover they could sell (make a quick buck at the expense of wireless mic users)&nbsp; Channel 70 (and now from what I believe most of the 60&#039;s as well)&nbsp;&nbsp; for use for 4g mobile services this meant that anyone who wanted a shared licence had to move to channel 38 (previously reserved for non broadcast use such as rf modulators in video achines and later on channel 5 in some areas). I do believe, however, that they did compensate users (probably by not that much) to help towards new channel 38 equipment of modifications to existing equipment. So maybe you may be able to get some compensation from the Australian regulator.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Daniel Levi, post: 91630, member: 2411"] Re: Australia Wireless Mic & IEM Frequency Changes Same thing happed in Britain, used to be that wireless mic users had a small portion of channel 69 (usually around 4 mics) and you could get a shared use licence for channel 70. OFCOM (Our communications regulator) then realised that with digital switchover they could sell (make a quick buck at the expense of wireless mic users) Channel 70 (and now from what I believe most of the 60's as well) for use for 4g mobile services this meant that anyone who wanted a shared licence had to move to channel 38 (previously reserved for non broadcast use such as rf modulators in video achines and later on channel 5 in some areas). I do believe, however, that they did compensate users (probably by not that much) to help towards new channel 38 equipment of modifications to existing equipment. So maybe you may be able to get some compensation from the Australian regulator. [/QUOTE]

Verification