Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RYAN LOUDMUSIC JENKINS" data-source="post: 640" data-attributes="member: 70">I have been reading Bennetts sub array articles over and over and experimenting with them and also using the GPA software to compare what I hear to what is shows.&nbsp; I am always trying to figure out the best solutions for my events.&nbsp; Obviously, we all know that the best solution can not always be implemented.&nbsp; I have also been following Dave Rat&#039;s Youtube videos regarding sub arrays and trying to learn as much as I can there too.What I am really curious about and I have absolutely no first hand experience with is large, vertical sub arrays.&nbsp; I is hard to picture in a two demensional view how the coverage would end up working.I picture in my mind that the typical dead zones would be in the the veritcal plane as in up in the air above people heads and down on the ground under peoples feet while the horizontal coverage would remain more consistant with less dead spots.Does anyone have some polars of vetical sub array predictions they can share so we can all learn a little.&nbsp; Or better yet, I would love to see Bennett work&nbsp; on a vertical sub array article since he really doesn&#039;t have too much on his hands with the website any everything else right now. I will be doing some experiments in March if I get a little time but I am so booked I don&#039;t know if I can get to it until at least then.Thanks a bunch, Ryan</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RYAN LOUDMUSIC JENKINS, post: 640, member: 70"] I have been reading Bennetts sub array articles over and over and experimenting with them and also using the GPA software to compare what I hear to what is shows. I am always trying to figure out the best solutions for my events. Obviously, we all know that the best solution can not always be implemented. I have also been following Dave Rat's Youtube videos regarding sub arrays and trying to learn as much as I can there too. What I am really curious about and I have absolutely no first hand experience with is large, vertical sub arrays. I is hard to picture in a two demensional view how the coverage would end up working. I picture in my mind that the typical dead zones would be in the the veritcal plane as in up in the air above people heads and down on the ground under peoples feet while the horizontal coverage would remain more consistant with less dead spots. Does anyone have some polars of vetical sub array predictions they can share so we can all learn a little. Or better yet, I would love to see Bennett work on a vertical sub array article since he really doesn't have too much on his hands with the website any everything else right now. I will be doing some experiments in March if I get a little time but I am so booked I don't know if I can get to it until at least then. Thanks a bunch, Ryan [/QUOTE]

Verification