Re: Cam Lock Ground Orientation
For Bennett- if you read the Code, the mechanical interlock (actual ability to connect only the "correct" cable, one at a time) like Posi-Lok is the first and preferred way. Posi-Loks suck. I've seen them on touring feeder a couple of times in 15 years, and that was on the feeder between generators and switch gear. Architects specify them because they're absolutely, positively NEC 520/525 compliant. Every venue that has them ends up building or buying Posi-to-cam tails.
Reversing the grounded conductors makes it impossible to immediately mate a phase leg to neutral or ground, effectively meeting the actual need of the Code.
Finally, posting a warning notice that requires the use of "Authorized Personnel" and specifies the connection and disconnection order will also suffice (unless the local AHJ requires the other measures).
@ Josh - Yepper. I train our employees to meter the tails before connecting the feeder; turn the switch off and verify that the other end of the feeder is connected, and then mate the tails to feeder. Re-verify that the other end of the feeder is properly connected to the appropriate device and that the device's master breaker or all branch circuit breakers are off. Throw the big switch and then meter the voltages at the device. Once determined to be correct, loads may be switched on.
This is one way you find "stinger" or "high" phase legs and other undocumented surprises, or find out your electrician is color blind and that green and red look the same to him...
While I haven't read the 2005 NEC, I've got older and newer versions handy, and they all have the same wording regarding single-pole separable connectors for theatrical applications [for those playing along, it's 520.53(k), 530.22, and 525.22(d), although articles 525 and 530 may have been rearranged between 1999 and 2008). All have the same wording in the 2011 NEC]. That wording allows for 3 methods of protecting the connectors:
1) An interlock that prevents the connectors from being energized untill all are mated (these are becoming more common on company switches and other tie-in points)
2) Listed sequential-interlocking-type connectors that can only be connected in the proper order (e.g. Posi-Lok)
3) A notice posted by the connectors dictating the proper conenction sequence (by far the most common)
Swapping the gender on the ground and neutral cables doesn't appear to satisfy any of these 3 methods. I will grant that it does make a hot/ground swap less likely, but I'd argue that someone who makes that mistake is not a qualified person to be working with feeder connectors. From an explanatory note to 520.53(k) in the 2011 NEC:
"Single-pole separable connectors are quick-connect feeder splicing and terminating devices, not attachment plugs or receptacles. They are designed to be sized, terminated, and inspected by a qualified person before being energized, and are to be guarded from accidental disconnection before being de-energized."
And Brian, the NEC allows for the use of tape to identify ground and neutral conductors larger than 4AWG, but is silent on line conductors. Every inspector I've run across has been fine with field-applied colored electrical tape designating feeder function (phase, neutral, ground).