Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Low Earth Orbit
DIY Audio
Coaxial Wedge Collaboration
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jeff Babcock" data-source="post: 22605" data-attributes="member: 46"><p>Re: Coaxial Wedge Collaboration</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, I think this is a pretty reasonable size given the response.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I agree with your thoughts re midrange response, I'm often cutting something in the 400-500 range and really don't need a ton of sensitivity in that range.</p><p> </p><p>Regarding processing, I'd suggest that if a passive crossover is used, that it lean towards something fairly flat, and have a DSP based biamp preset that approximates this response. This would work well for general purpose use, for example if you wanted to use the wedge as a front fill or for similar alternate duty.</p><p></p><p>I would then suggest having a biamp preset that is "tweaked for typical monitor duty", which offers slightly better GBF and a few minor tweaks that are a good starting point for monitor use.</p><p></p><p>This seems to be a recent trend, I know EAW publishes several presets for the MW line, and I like this idea.</p><p></p><p>Of course any processor settings need to take into consideration the sometimes significant differences between different mfr's DSP units running the exact same settings. No point in worrying about this yet, though.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jeff Babcock, post: 22605, member: 46"] Re: Coaxial Wedge Collaboration Yes, I think this is a pretty reasonable size given the response. I agree with your thoughts re midrange response, I'm often cutting something in the 400-500 range and really don't need a ton of sensitivity in that range. Regarding processing, I'd suggest that if a passive crossover is used, that it lean towards something fairly flat, and have a DSP based biamp preset that approximates this response. This would work well for general purpose use, for example if you wanted to use the wedge as a front fill or for similar alternate duty. I would then suggest having a biamp preset that is "tweaked for typical monitor duty", which offers slightly better GBF and a few minor tweaks that are a good starting point for monitor use. This seems to be a recent trend, I know EAW publishes several presets for the MW line, and I like this idea. Of course any processor settings need to take into consideration the sometimes significant differences between different mfr's DSP units running the exact same settings. No point in worrying about this yet, though. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Low Earth Orbit
DIY Audio
Coaxial Wedge Collaboration
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!