Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Low Earth Orbit
DIY Audio
Coaxial Wedge Collaboration
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jeff Babcock" data-source="post: 26709" data-attributes="member: 46"><p>Re: FBT Verve 12m</p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Hi Kimo,</p><p></p><p>No, the FBT does not appear to use the 12CXN76 or for that matter be very similar.</p><p></p><p>Their product page says it is a custom driver.</p><p></p><p>FBT is crossing at 1.8K, whereas B&C recommends 1.2K for the 12CXN76.</p><p></p><p>The coverage pattern of the FBT is 90deg conical , whereas the 12CXN76 is 80deg </p><p></p><p>FBT rates their box at 300W RMS, the 12CXN76 is a 350W RMS driver.</p><p></p><p>Based on these specification differences I believe the 12CXN76 should be a better driver.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jeff Babcock, post: 26709, member: 46"] Re: FBT Verve 12m Hi Kimo, No, the FBT does not appear to use the 12CXN76 or for that matter be very similar. Their product page says it is a custom driver. FBT is crossing at 1.8K, whereas B&C recommends 1.2K for the 12CXN76. The coverage pattern of the FBT is 90deg conical , whereas the 12CXN76 is 80deg FBT rates their box at 300W RMS, the 12CXN76 is a 350W RMS driver. Based on these specification differences I believe the 12CXN76 should be a better driver. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Low Earth Orbit
DIY Audio
Coaxial Wedge Collaboration
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!