Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tim McCulloch" data-source="post: 15695" data-attributes="member: 67">Re: combined latency in IEM with 01v96Dunno about the WC, but it&#039;s the multiple AD/DA conversions looping their analog way around that concerns me most.I think digital to digital should have a latency of exactly 1 sample in each direction, but I hedged my bet <img src="http://www.soundforums.net/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" />&nbsp;&nbsp; I&#039;m probably wrong, too... but I&#039;ll stick my neck out of this one.One way to measure the digital transmission/cascade latency would be to measure from the analog in of the first ADAT AD converter to the analog out of the last console&#039;s ADAT DA.&nbsp; The ADAT devices have published latency specs that can be factored in.&nbsp; There are probably better ways, but I&#039;m having a brain cramp figuring out how to get an ADAT pipe into my laptop...Let&#039;s see what the forum has to say!Tim Mc</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tim McCulloch, post: 15695, member: 67"] Re: combined latency in IEM with 01v96 Dunno about the WC, but it's the multiple AD/DA conversions looping their analog way around that concerns me most. I think digital to digital should have a latency of exactly 1 sample in each direction, but I hedged my bet [img]http://www.soundforums.net/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif[/img] I'm probably wrong, too... but I'll stick my neck out of this one. One way to measure the digital transmission/cascade latency would be to measure from the analog in of the first ADAT AD converter to the analog out of the last console's ADAT DA. The ADAT devices have published latency specs that can be factored in. There are probably better ways, but I'm having a brain cramp figuring out how to get an ADAT pipe into my laptop... Let's see what the forum has to say! Tim Mc [/QUOTE]

Verification