Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Off Topic
The Basement
Concert Photography
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TJ Cornish" data-source="post: 16344" data-attributes="member: 162"><p>Re: Concert Photography</p><p></p><p>I've had great luck with both Bibble and Adobe Camera Raw (Photoshop) - better than Canon's tool (I shoot a 5DII). My results after basic RAW tweaking are vastly better than JPGs out of the camera.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Though it certainly takes a little bit more processing time to do the actual conversion, I don't find it adds much to my workflow - I need to look through them all anyway, rate them, and do basic edits, whether they are JPG or RAW. The extra 2 stops of dynamic range I get from the RAW file and easier white balance adjustments more than make up for the 1/2 second per shot time it takes to batch them to JPG on my 2009 MacBook Pro. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Arguably the bigger downside is the larger file size necessitating larger memory cards and more time to transfer from card to computer.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I've done it both ways, and I'm not going back.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TJ Cornish, post: 16344, member: 162"] Re: Concert Photography I've had great luck with both Bibble and Adobe Camera Raw (Photoshop) - better than Canon's tool (I shoot a 5DII). My results after basic RAW tweaking are vastly better than JPGs out of the camera. Though it certainly takes a little bit more processing time to do the actual conversion, I don't find it adds much to my workflow - I need to look through them all anyway, rate them, and do basic edits, whether they are JPG or RAW. The extra 2 stops of dynamic range I get from the RAW file and easier white balance adjustments more than make up for the 1/2 second per shot time it takes to batch them to JPG on my 2009 MacBook Pro. Arguably the bigger downside is the larger file size necessitating larger memory cards and more time to transfer from card to computer. I've done it both ways, and I'm not going back. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Off Topic
The Basement
Concert Photography
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!