Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
Creating a better money channel in IEM land
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Emil Gawaziuk" data-source="post: 40146" data-attributes="member: 297"><p>Re: Creating a better money channel in IEM land</p><p></p><p>Rest of the mix isn't the problem, it sits pretty solidly tonality-wise. However on his vocal, he just isn't getting a desired warmth and response. It may be a latency issue (wireless-LS9-wireless again. It is slight, I can hear it if I really really concentrate on it, but stranger things have happened) as Bennett suggests, but in the long run it is a tonal issue. I am trying to eliminate the inherent sound of an LS9 (not my console choice on the gig. If I had my way it would be a DigiCo, Midas, or Avid. But that is besides the point. My aim is to have a solid analog vocal chain that is the same no matter what the rest of the mix is going through.). </p><p></p><p>The nice thing is I can set up one channel for the Beta capsule and the other for the KSM. The Beta is not the preferred, but on some of the smaller decks and lower roof shows the KSM is not your friend when one is 6 feet from a hard hitting drummer. Just looking for a good workable solution with 4 sweepable bands, a solid sounding preamp, and a way to combine a stereo mix with an analog signal in the analog domain before it heads to the PSM900 tx (once again I would prefer Sennheiser as they sound way way better but the packs will not drive to the level he desires without shitting the bed. The Shures do.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Emil Gawaziuk, post: 40146, member: 297"] Re: Creating a better money channel in IEM land Rest of the mix isn't the problem, it sits pretty solidly tonality-wise. However on his vocal, he just isn't getting a desired warmth and response. It may be a latency issue (wireless-LS9-wireless again. It is slight, I can hear it if I really really concentrate on it, but stranger things have happened) as Bennett suggests, but in the long run it is a tonal issue. I am trying to eliminate the inherent sound of an LS9 (not my console choice on the gig. If I had my way it would be a DigiCo, Midas, or Avid. But that is besides the point. My aim is to have a solid analog vocal chain that is the same no matter what the rest of the mix is going through.). The nice thing is I can set up one channel for the Beta capsule and the other for the KSM. The Beta is not the preferred, but on some of the smaller decks and lower roof shows the KSM is not your friend when one is 6 feet from a hard hitting drummer. Just looking for a good workable solution with 4 sweepable bands, a solid sounding preamp, and a way to combine a stereo mix with an analog signal in the analog domain before it heads to the PSM900 tx (once again I would prefer Sennheiser as they sound way way better but the packs will not drive to the level he desires without shitting the bed. The Shures do.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
Creating a better money channel in IEM land
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!