Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jay Barracato" data-source="post: 40169" data-attributes="member: 24">Re: Creating a better money channel in IEM landI have been wondering about the different perception of IEMS for singers versus instrumentalists.Is the latency factor more or less of a concern because of the occlusion, and is there a frequency dependency?Is there a possibly a reverse latency effect where even with digital latency, something is arriving earlier than the performer is used to, compared to wedges.?And since many of my performers are using IEM in conjunction with a single large LDC mic, does changing distance to the mic create a noticable timing difference?I have several different acts happy with IEM mixs, but I find it really hard to listen to any of the vocalists channels when the relative levels are set the way they want, so I have concluded I really can&#039;t know what they are hearing in their head (occlusion effect plus buds).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jay Barracato, post: 40169, member: 24"] Re: Creating a better money channel in IEM land I have been wondering about the different perception of IEMS for singers versus instrumentalists. Is the latency factor more or less of a concern because of the occlusion, and is there a frequency dependency? Is there a possibly a reverse latency effect where even with digital latency, something is arriving earlier than the performer is used to, compared to wedges.? And since many of my performers are using IEM in conjunction with a single large LDC mic, does changing distance to the mic create a noticable timing difference? I have several different acts happy with IEM mixs, but I find it really hard to listen to any of the vocalists channels when the relative levels are set the way they want, so I have concluded I really can't know what they are hearing in their head (occlusion effect plus buds). [/QUOTE]

Verification