Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
Creating a better money channel in IEM land
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John B. Miller" data-source="post: 40229" data-attributes="member: 1031"><p>Re: Creating a better money channel in IEM land</p><p></p><p>I've been a singer <em>and</em> a sound company owner for over 20 years. The very first digital desk that I bought was an 01v, and the very first time I heard the digital "thing" in the IEMs was the very first gig at which my band used the 01v. I instantly heard the phase/latency effect on my voice, and it was very distressing and distracting.</p><p></p><p>Once I figured out what was causing it, I did what the OP is talking about and split my vocal mic into a small analog mixer, and simply had my monitor mix (with the rest of the stuff in it minus my vocal) returned to another channel of my analog mixer. The analog mixer's headphone amp serves to drive my IEMs. Problem solved.</p><p></p><p>I also share Art's frustration when recording to a DAW where the monitor mix goes through an AD/DA conversion before I hear it back in the phones.</p><p></p><p>Go ahead and get your singer an analog signal chain, even if it's only for his vocal. The effect on anything other than vocals is not detectable...at least by me, so the rest of his mix can be generated in the LS9 and sent to his analog mix. It's certainly very easy to do, and worth a try. Any small, decent analog mixer should suffice, at least for an experiment.</p><p></p><p>Best of luck.</p><p></p><p>John</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John B. Miller, post: 40229, member: 1031"] Re: Creating a better money channel in IEM land I've been a singer [I]and[/I] a sound company owner for over 20 years. The very first digital desk that I bought was an 01v, and the very first time I heard the digital "thing" in the IEMs was the very first gig at which my band used the 01v. I instantly heard the phase/latency effect on my voice, and it was very distressing and distracting. Once I figured out what was causing it, I did what the OP is talking about and split my vocal mic into a small analog mixer, and simply had my monitor mix (with the rest of the stuff in it minus my vocal) returned to another channel of my analog mixer. The analog mixer's headphone amp serves to drive my IEMs. Problem solved. I also share Art's frustration when recording to a DAW where the monitor mix goes through an AD/DA conversion before I hear it back in the phones. Go ahead and get your singer an analog signal chain, even if it's only for his vocal. The effect on anything other than vocals is not detectable...at least by me, so the rest of his mix can be generated in the LS9 and sent to his analog mix. It's certainly very easy to do, and worth a try. Any small, decent analog mixer should suffice, at least for an experiment. Best of luck. John [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
Creating a better money channel in IEM land
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!