Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Karl Winkler" data-source="post: 40247" data-attributes="member: 255">Re: Creating a better money channel in IEM landI don&#039;t mean to unduly promote our IEM system, only to point out that it exists. Here is a thorough review by Langston Holland: <a href="http://www.soundforums.net/live/threads/1988-Lectrosonics-Quadra-Digital-IEM-Review" target="_blank">http://www.soundforums.net/live/threads/1988-Lectrosonics-Quadra-Digital-IEM-Review</a>Since latency is a topic in this thread and also in Langston&#039;s review, it is worth addressing.Our system does use digital transmission, and thus we took pains to minimize latency. The result, interestingly (as noted in Langston&#039;s thread) is that with an analog source, our system exhibits 0.95 ms of overall latency. However, with digital sources, depending on the sample rate, the latency is greater - it spans between 2 and 3 ms. However, this turns out to be only a very small amount more than if you use a digital console with an analog IEM. Whether or not any of these delays will affect your singer, the only way is to try it. Obviously, there are lots of major tours out with digital monitor consoles and analog IEM systems. Thus, most artists with this type of setup have between 1.8 and 2.5 ms of latency between their microphone and their ears.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Karl Winkler, post: 40247, member: 255"] Re: Creating a better money channel in IEM land I don't mean to unduly promote our IEM system, only to point out that it exists. Here is a thorough review by Langston Holland: [url]http://www.soundforums.net/live/threads/1988-Lectrosonics-Quadra-Digital-IEM-Review[/url] Since latency is a topic in this thread and also in Langston's review, it is worth addressing. Our system does use digital transmission, and thus we took pains to minimize latency. The result, interestingly (as noted in Langston's thread) is that with an analog source, our system exhibits 0.95 ms of overall latency. However, with digital sources, depending on the sample rate, the latency is greater - it spans between 2 and 3 ms. However, this turns out to be only a very small amount more than if you use a digital console with an analog IEM. Whether or not any of these delays will affect your singer, the only way is to try it. Obviously, there are lots of major tours out with digital monitor consoles and analog IEM systems. Thus, most artists with this type of setup have between 1.8 and 2.5 ms of latency between their microphone and their ears. [/QUOTE]

Verification