Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="John Roberts" data-source="post: 34542" data-attributes="member: 126">Re: D-FendNo worries in fact the reminder was good... IIRC Ivan was supposed to be getting one to check out (with all his spare time <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :-)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" />, and was was going to give us report. As with any dynamic protection device, the perceived performance may be influenced by things that have nothing to do with the technology&#039;s baseline performance (like side chain time constants). A lot of tweaking goes on inside amp clip limiters to make them sound relatively neutral, while this may have a little more flexibility to operate more gracefully, except for excursion protection that needs to be quick. &nbsp;JR</blockquote>

[QUOTE="John Roberts, post: 34542, member: 126"] Re: D-Fend No worries in fact the reminder was good... IIRC Ivan was supposed to be getting one to check out (with all his spare time :-), and was was going to give us report. As with any dynamic protection device, the perceived performance may be influenced by things that have nothing to do with the technology's baseline performance (like side chain time constants). A lot of tweaking goes on inside amp clip limiters to make them sound relatively neutral, while this may have a little more flexibility to operate more gracefully, except for excursion protection that needs to be quick. JR [/QUOTE]

Verification