Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
Damping Factor - Actual listening tests?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Roberts" data-source="post: 145721" data-attributes="member: 126"><p>Re: Damping Factor - Actual listening tests?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Marty McCann Peavey's clinician used to do a demo where he artificially lowered the damping factor for some speakers on sticks to show what low damping factor sounded like. </p><p></p><p>I attended one such session and as expected the differences were subtle and not even heard by all in attendance. </p><p></p><p>Since I haven't said this lately, DF is an old archaic specification left over from tube amplifier days, when amps had higher output impedance. It takes a lot of wire to make that much source impedance. Then the audibility depends on the speaker, the less flat the speaker impedance vs frequency, the more audible any errors generated. </p><p></p><p>If you want to do your own experiments you can do a crude null by setting up two identical speakers driven by identical (or the same amp channel) through different wire lengths. </p><p></p><p>Then bridge a mono headphone across the two loudspeaker hots, or maybe one can between the hots and another between the grounds, while the null will be better if you use short cables for both returns and just the long cable for the one hot. </p><p></p><p>For fixed install running speakers at 70V/100V constant voltage with step down transformers helps manage wire losses. For subs you are generally better off locating the amps proximate to the subs since LF will not play nicely with step up/down transformers. </p><p></p><p>JR</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Roberts, post: 145721, member: 126"] Re: Damping Factor - Actual listening tests? Marty McCann Peavey's clinician used to do a demo where he artificially lowered the damping factor for some speakers on sticks to show what low damping factor sounded like. I attended one such session and as expected the differences were subtle and not even heard by all in attendance. Since I haven't said this lately, DF is an old archaic specification left over from tube amplifier days, when amps had higher output impedance. It takes a lot of wire to make that much source impedance. Then the audibility depends on the speaker, the less flat the speaker impedance vs frequency, the more audible any errors generated. If you want to do your own experiments you can do a crude null by setting up two identical speakers driven by identical (or the same amp channel) through different wire lengths. Then bridge a mono headphone across the two loudspeaker hots, or maybe one can between the hots and another between the grounds, while the null will be better if you use short cables for both returns and just the long cable for the one hot. For fixed install running speakers at 70V/100V constant voltage with step down transformers helps manage wire losses. For subs you are generally better off locating the amps proximate to the subs since LF will not play nicely with step up/down transformers. JR [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
Damping Factor - Actual listening tests?
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!