Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Death to... test what you think you know
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Roberts" data-source="post: 97211" data-attributes="member: 126"><p>Re: Death to... test what you think you know</p><p></p><p>In the interest of completeness it may be worth inspecting how "most" GEQ are designed. They first create individual bandpass filters for each GEQ center frequency then add or subtract that BP signal to the dry path to create boost or cut. These are pretty much a blunt instrument, a dull knife so to speak, with different topology/design philosophy variations. How adjacent bands combine and interact with each other will vary with different circuit topologies and different design trade-offs. (insert my tired Q definition rant here). </p><p></p><p>A smart digital GEQ could be taught to interpret adjacent "death to" slider settings differently, but conventional GEQs will give conventionally poor combined results. Adding deep GEQ cut near a critical crossover pole is asking for trouble as crossovers are not just about amplitude but phase response in the critical transition region. </p><p></p><p>JR</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Roberts, post: 97211, member: 126"] Re: Death to... test what you think you know In the interest of completeness it may be worth inspecting how "most" GEQ are designed. They first create individual bandpass filters for each GEQ center frequency then add or subtract that BP signal to the dry path to create boost or cut. These are pretty much a blunt instrument, a dull knife so to speak, with different topology/design philosophy variations. How adjacent bands combine and interact with each other will vary with different circuit topologies and different design trade-offs. (insert my tired Q definition rant here). A smart digital GEQ could be taught to interpret adjacent "death to" slider settings differently, but conventional GEQs will give conventionally poor combined results. Adding deep GEQ cut near a critical crossover pole is asking for trouble as crossovers are not just about amplitude but phase response in the critical transition region. JR [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Death to... test what you think you know
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!