Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jay Barracato" data-source="post: 97257" data-attributes="member: 24">Re: Death to... test what you think you knowJon,I am not sure what you are saying. The graph I just posted is just an eq, like it would be wired in a monitor system with no other dap, just as I labeled the graph.The first graphs are a geq then a dsp in series, just how they would be deployed. Yes there are two different bands pasted together on the same graph so you can see how they interact. You can also compare with the graph that shows the identical patching and bands, but with the Geq set flat. The only different in those two sets of measurements is where the faders on the Geq is set.I am perfectly aware that this is bad practice. It is a bad practice I encounter all the time when working as a band engineer on other peoples systems. Since the bad practice is so common, I was attempting to show why it is a bad practice. No where have I said this is something I do or encourage others to do.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jay Barracato, post: 97257, member: 24"] Re: Death to... test what you think you know Jon, I am not sure what you are saying. The graph I just posted is just an eq, like it would be wired in a monitor system with no other dap, just as I labeled the graph. The first graphs are a geq then a dsp in series, just how they would be deployed. Yes there are two different bands pasted together on the same graph so you can see how they interact. You can also compare with the graph that shows the identical patching and bands, but with the Geq set flat. The only different in those two sets of measurements is where the faders on the Geq is set. I am perfectly aware that this is bad practice. It is a bad practice I encounter all the time when working as a band engineer on other peoples systems. Since the bad practice is so common, I was attempting to show why it is a bad practice. No where have I said this is something I do or encourage others to do. [/QUOTE]

Verification