Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Alan Sledzieski" data-source="post: 131180" data-attributes="member: 1022">Re: Difference between Cardioid and hypercardioid polar - Buying a Mic!That boost can also add to feedback issues. Im just a weekend warrioor myself doing sound and this is what I&#039;ve found&nbsp; Fwiw, I have 835&#039;s 845&#039;s, om2&#039;s om3&#039;s om5&#039;s, beta 58&#039;s and 58&#039;s-Beta 58&#039;s, I sold them all.-om5, sold it as I heard nothing special when I used it.-835, one step less bright as a beta 58 and they sit in the case all the time now.-845, I still use this, seems to be the right mic for one girl I work with. Plus less feedback issues then a 835 when she decides to bend over and stick the mic in the monitor to pic up her tamborine,,,,,-om2,om3&nbsp; Well these are what I use now when I put mics up for people.&nbsp; People who do not hold a mic and just leave in a stand like a -musician I use the om2.&nbsp; The mic seems to have some handling noise.-So I tried a om3 on singers that always have the mic in their hand, the om3 rolls off in the bottom end some so this helps.-58&#039;s, I have a few but have found that I can control the 0m2&#039;s and 3&#039;s a little easier the 58&#039;s-0m7, I have never tried, from what I have read about the mic it seems like its for Ozzy on a huge stage, along with the low gain and people I work with that sing from a wispper in one song to thinking they are Rob Halford in the next song I don&#039;t think it would work well for me so I didn&#039;t try one.- Don&#039;t be afraid to try a om2 or 3, if the 835 is to bright for ya.&nbsp; Like I said they ( 835) sit in the case now.I know this your topic but I was thinking on trying a om3 wireless.&nbsp; I have a few people I work with, with really bad wireless mics, that insist on using them.&nbsp;&nbsp; So for my next season I want to have a wireless that I can have available.&nbsp; Point to this is, Anyone have any expeirence with the om3 wireless?&nbsp; If this is over stepping the bounds to your topic Mike just ask people not to reply to my question.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Alan Sledzieski, post: 131180, member: 1022"] Re: Difference between Cardioid and hypercardioid polar - Buying a Mic! That boost can also add to feedback issues. Im just a weekend warrioor myself doing sound and this is what I've found Fwiw, I have 835's 845's, om2's om3's om5's, beta 58's and 58's -Beta 58's, I sold them all. -om5, sold it as I heard nothing special when I used it. -835, one step less bright as a beta 58 and they sit in the case all the time now. -845, I still use this, seems to be the right mic for one girl I work with. Plus less feedback issues then a 835 when she decides to bend over and stick the mic in the monitor to pic up her tamborine,,,,, -om2,om3 Well these are what I use now when I put mics up for people. People who do not hold a mic and just leave in a stand like a -musician I use the om2. The mic seems to have some handling noise. -So I tried a om3 on singers that always have the mic in their hand, the om3 rolls off in the bottom end some so this helps. -58's, I have a few but have found that I can control the 0m2's and 3's a little easier the 58's -0m7, I have never tried, from what I have read about the mic it seems like its for Ozzy on a huge stage, along with the low gain and people I work with that sing from a wispper in one song to thinking they are Rob Halford in the next song I don't think it would work well for me so I didn't try one. - Don't be afraid to try a om2 or 3, if the 835 is to bright for ya. Like I said they ( 835) sit in the case now. I know this your topic but I was thinking on trying a om3 wireless. I have a few people I work with, with really bad wireless mics, that insist on using them. So for my next season I want to have a wireless that I can have available. Point to this is, Anyone have any expeirence with the om3 wireless? If this is over stepping the bounds to your topic Mike just ask people not to reply to my question. [/QUOTE]

Verification